State v. Tully

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 8, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 218 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. David Eugene Tully, Defendant and Appellant No. 20220214 Appeal from the District Court of Nelson County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable M. Jason McCarthy, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Jayme J. Tenneson, State’s Attorney, Lakota, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, N.D., for defendant and appellant. State v. Tully No. 20220214 Per Curiam. [¶1] David Tully appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he pled guilty to terrorizing in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-04. On appeal, Tully argues that his case should be remanded to the district court to withdraw his guilty plea because the court failed to substantially comply with N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1)(A)-(E) and (3). He did not raise these issues at the district court. We do not address issues raised for the first time on appeal unless they rise to the level of obvious error affecting substantial rights under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b). State v. Hoehn, 2019 ND 222, ¶ 20, 932 N.W.2d 553; State v. Cox, 2017 ND 23, ¶¶ 8, 10, 889 N.W.2d 848. This Court finds no obvious error, and we therefore summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) & (7). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.