Matter of Amy Jo Yates

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MAY 12, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 103 In the Matter of the Petition of Shane Lance Yates for Name Change No. 20220054 In the Matter of the Petition of Amy Jo Yates for Name Change No. 20220056 Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stephannie N. Stiel, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Shane L. Yates, self-represented, Fargo, ND, appellant. Amy J. Yates, self-represented, Fargo, ND, appellant. Matter of Shane Lance Yates No. 20220054 Matter of Amy Jo Yates No. 20220056 Per Curiam. [¶1] Shane Lance Yates and Amy Jo Yates (“Petitioners”) appeal district court orders denying their petitions for name changes and requests for evidentiary hearings. The Petitioners sought to change their names from “SHANE LANCE YATES” (in all uppercase letters) to “Shane Lance Yates” and “AMY JO YATES” (in all uppercase letters) to “Amy Jo Yates.” The Petitioners argue the court erred because they are exercising their private core civilian rights and that they should have been granted a private evidentiary hearing. We conclude the district court did not err in denying the petitions for name changes or requests for evidentiary hearings. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7); Matter of Yates, 2022 ND 11, ¶ 5, 969 N.W.2d 195 (holding there was no proper and reasonable cause for the district court to change two individuals’ names from all capital letters to initial capital letters followed by lowercase letters because such a request was not a change from one name to another); Matter of Mees, 465 N.W.2d 172, 173 (N.D. 1991) (“Section 32-28-02, N.D.C.C., does not require an evidentiary hearing in conjunction with a petition for change of name.”). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.