Rogers v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 17, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 50 Mark Allen Rogers, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20210260 Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Todd L. Cresap, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Christopher W. Nelson, Assistant State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for respondent and appellee. Rogers v. State No. 20210260 Per Curiam. [¶1] Mark Allen Rogers appeals from a district court order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Rogers sought to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming his trial counsel was ineffective and there was an insufficient factual basis for his guilty plea. The court denied Rogers’ petition for postconviction relief. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding Rogers failed to meet his burden to prove ineffective assistance of counsel and in denying Rogers’ petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Norman G. Anderson, S.J. [¶3] The Honorable Norman G. Anderson, S.J., sitting in place of McEvers, J., disqualified. 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
