Visser v. Visser, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 23, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 231 Alexandra Visser, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Joshua Visser, Defendant and Appellant and State of North Dakota Statutory Real Party in Interest No. 20210151 Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Bradley A. Cruff, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Tracey R. Lindberg, Pelican Rapids, MN, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Jeffrey Sprout, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Visser v. Visser No. 20210151 Per Curiam. [¶1] Joshua Visser appeals from a district court order denying his motion to modify primary residential responsibility for the child he has with Alexandra Visser. Joshua Visser argues the district court erred in denying his motion because there was evidence of several material changes in circumstance and the court’s findings under the best interest factors are clearly erroneous. We conclude the district court’s decision is not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
