Guardianship and Conservatorship of T.G.P.C.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT NOVEMBER 26, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 207 In the Matter of the Guardianship and Conservatorship of T.G.P.C., an incapacitated person J.P.C., Petitioner v. Guardian and Protective Services, Inc., successor guardian and conservator; Respondent and T.G.P.C., ward, Respondent and Appellee and T.P.C. and L.P.C., Interested Parties and Appellants No. 20210121 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Theresa L. Kellington, Bismarck, ND, for interested parties and appellants; submitted on brief. Jesse Walstad, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee. Guardianship and Conservatorship of T.G.P.C. No. 20210121 Per Curiam. [¶1] T.P.C. and L.P.C. appeal from the “Findings of Fact and Order Reappointing Guardian and Conservatorship and Continuing Guardianship Following Review and Denying Petitioners Request in Full.” They argue the district court abused its discretion in denying their motion to remove Guardian and Protective Services, Inc. (“GaPS”) as guardian and conservator. Additionally, they argue the court abused its discretion by not appointing them as co-guardians and co-conservators because they had statutory priority. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion and reappointing GaPS. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Carol Ronning Kapsner, S.J. [¶3] The Honorable Carol Ronning Kapsner, S.J., sitting in place of Crothers, J., disqualified. 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
