State v. Rennie

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 66 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Arnold Nudah Rennie, Defendant and Appellant No. 20200307 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Rennie No. 20200307 Per Curiam. [¶1] Arnold Rennie appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition and corruption of a minor. [¶2] On appeal, Rennie argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to dismiss based on alleged Rule 16, N.D.R.Crim.P., discovery violations by the State. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rennie’s motion to dismiss. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.