Interest of D.M.H.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 3/21/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2019 ND 88 Interest of D.M.H., a child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. D.M.H., child, J.D.H., father, J.H.T., guardian, L.H.T., guardian, and Lisa Larsen, Lay Guardian Ad Litem, Respondents and S.L.S., Respondent and Appellant No. 20180313 Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Jay D. Knudson, Judge. REVERSED AND REMANDED. Per Curiam. Nancy D. Yon, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Rhiannon L. Gorham, Grand Forks, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. Interest of D.M.H. No. 20180313 Per Curiam. [¶1] S.L.S., the mother of D.M.H., a minor child, appeals from the juvenile court’s order appointing the child’s paternal grandparents as legal guardians for D.M.H. The juvenile court did not establish a visitation schedule for S.L.S. Her parental rights have not been terminated. S.L.S. argues the juvenile court should have included a visitation schedule in its order rather than delegate visitation decisions to the child’s guardians. The State agrees with S.L.S. and joins her request for a remand for the juvenile court to establish a visitation schedule. [¶2] We summarily reverse under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b) and remand for further proceedings. Interest of G.L., 2018 ND 176, ¶ 15, 915 N.W.2d 685 (holding a juvenile court may not delegate parental visitation to a child’s guardian). We remand for a determination by the juvenile court whether visitation “is likely to endanger the child’s physical or emotional health.” Id. at ¶ 14; N.D.C.C. § 14-05-22(2). If the juvenile court finds that visitation between S.L.S. and D.M.H. is not a danger to the child, it must order an appropriate visitation schedule. [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Donovan J. Foughty, D.J. [¶4] The Honorable Donovan J. Foughty, D.J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.