Lunde v. Paulson

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 5 Summarily affirm default judgment based on a lack of errors appearing on the face of the judgment roll.



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2019 ND 5

Paul A. Lunde, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Brad Michael Paulson, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20180248

Appeal from the District Court of Benson County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Donovan J. Foughty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Scott A. Hager, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Brad Paulson, self-represented, Maddock, ND, defendant and appellant.

Lunde v. PaulsonNo. 20180248

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Brad Paulson appealed from a default judgment ordering him to pay $1.5 million in damages to Paul Lunde stemming from a May 2015 physical altercation. Paulson argues he was not properly served either the summons and complaint nor the notice of motion for default judgment.

[¶2] Rule 60(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., is the exclusive means for opening a default judgment and, when made for reasons of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, must be made within one year after a default judgment has been entered. Flemming v. Flemming, 2010 ND 212, ¶ 3, 790 N.W.2d 762; N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(c). We conclude there are no irregularities on the face of the default judgment, and we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). See Burgard v. Burgard, 2013 ND 27, ¶ 11, 827 N.W.2d 1 ("[w]hen a default judgment is appealed, rather than a district court's order regarding a N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the default judgment, we review the default judgment to determine if irregularities appear on the face of the judgment").

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.