Beeter v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 129 Summary dismissal of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 129

Robert Duane Beeter, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20180032

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Ashlei A. Neufeld, Assistant State's Attorney, Minot, N.D., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Beeter v. StateNo. 20180032

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Robert Beeter appeals from a district court judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Beeter argues that the district court erred by concluding his application was barred by the statute of limitations. He contends the 2017 amendment to N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a new interpretation of law and the district court should have retroactively applied it to his case. See N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(a)(3). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), concluding Beeter's application was time-barred. See State v. Iverson, 2006 ND 193, ¶¶ 6-8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (denying retroactive application of statute that became effective after final conviction).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.