Nur v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 40 Order denying defendant's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 40

Ibrahim Hassan Nur, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20170349

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Tracy E. Hines (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, and Tristan J. Van de Streek (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.

Nur v. StateNo. 20170349

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ibrahim Hassan Nur appeals from the district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Nur argues he did not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive his right to counsel, and he argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court did not err in summarily denying Nur's application for post-conviction relief for misuse of process on the issue of his waiver to the right to counsel. Also, the district court did not err in denying Nur's application for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel and its findings of fact were not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (6).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.