Saucedo v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 2 Order denying defendant's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 2

Joe Ramon Saucedo, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20170224

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr (argued), Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Jodi A. Bass (argued), Carmell F. Mattison (on brief), Assistant State's Attorneys, and Jenna Bergman (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellee.

Saucedo v. StateNo. 20170224

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Joe Saucedo appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Saucedo argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not clearly err in denying Saucedo's application.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.