State v. Vann
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 275 Criminal convictions for terrorizing are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 275
State of North
Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
James Jarrel Vann, Defendant and
Appellant
No. 20170171
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh
County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable
Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ryan A. Keefe (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, and
Marina Spahr (appeared), Assistant State's Attorney,
Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
James R.
Loraas, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.
State v. VannNo. 20170171
Per Curiam.
[¶1] James Vann appealed from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of four counts of terrorizing under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-17-04(1). Vann argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdicts for terrorizing, because there was insufficient evidence that he intended to place other persons in fear of their life or he recklessly disregarded the risk of causing that fear and there was insufficient evidence that he threatened to commit a crime of violence or an act dangerous to human life. We conclude the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, is sufficient to support the convictions for all four counts of terrorizing, and we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W.
VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J.
Jensen
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.