State v. Sabot
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 280 A criminal judgment for terrorizing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 280
State of North
Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Eric Lance Sabot, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170100
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South
Central Judicial District, the Honorable Dann Edward
Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd R. Erickson, Assistant State's Attorney, Washburn,
ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Thomas J.
Glass, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
State v. SabotNo. 20170100
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Eric Sabot appeals from a criminal judgment, entered after a bench trial, finding him guilty of terrorizing. Sabot argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to convict him of terrorizing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding sufficient evidence supports Sabot's conviction.
[¶2] Gerald W.
VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair
McEvers
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.