Jasmann v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 150 A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (7).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 150

Matthew Jasmann, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160396

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Thomas J. Glass, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Frederick R. Fremgen, Stutsman County State's Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for respondent and appellee.

Jasmann v. StateNo. 20160396

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Matthew Jasmann appealed from the district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. In his application, Jasmann argued: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the State failed to obtain evidence which was exculpatory in nature, and (3) the State's actions during trial amounted to prosecutorial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2), (7). State v. Steffes, 500 N.W.2d 608, 612 (N.D. 1993) ("Police generally have no duty to collect evidence for the defense.").

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.