Buresh v. State
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 114 A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 114
Paul Elliot
Buresh, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and
Appellee
No. 20160378
Appeal from the District Court of Walsh
County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable M. Richard
Geiger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Scott O. Diamond, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and
appellant; submitted on brief.
Barbara L. Whelan,
Grafton, N.D., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Buresh v. StateNo. 20160378
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Paul Buresh appeals a district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Buresh argues he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel prior to entering his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Buresh's application for post-conviction relief.
[¶2] Gerald W.
VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Carol
Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.