State v. Russell

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 62 Criminal judgments entered after a jury found defendant guilty of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 62

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Charles William Russell, II, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160310

Appeal from the District Court of McKenzie County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Robin A. Schmidt, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Stephenie L. Davis, McKenzie County Assistant State's Attorney, 210 Fifth Street Northwest, Suite 550, Watford City, N.D. 58854, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Scott O. Diamond, 3523 45th Street South, Suite 100, Fargo, N.D. 58104, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. RussellNo. 20160310

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Charles Russell appeals from criminal judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Russell argues his convictions should be reversed because the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's verdicts. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.