Moline v. Workforce Safety and Insurance

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order terminating a claimant's disability benefits, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 7

Stanley Moline, Appellant
v.
Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellee and Wyoming Casing Service, Inc., Respondent

No. 20160275

Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Steven L. Latham, P.O. Box 2056, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2056, for appellant; submitted on brief.
Jacqueline S. Anderson, P.O. Box 2626, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2626, for appellee.

Moline v. Workforce Safety and InsuranceNo. 20160275

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Stanley Moline appeals from a district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order affirming the termination of his disability benefits. Moline argues the administrative law judge erred in finding he was not justified in refusing a transitional job offer from his employer. A preponderance of the evidence supports the administrative law judge's decision that Moline was not entitled to temporary disability benefits because he voluntarily limited his income without justification. We summarily affirm the district court judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.