State v. Borden

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition, aggravated assault, and menacing is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 46

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Antonio Shaquille Borden, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160187

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Frederick R. Fremgen, Assistant State's Attorney, 511 Second Avenue S.E., Jamestown, ND 58401, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Russell J. Myhre, 341 Central Avenue North, Suite 3, P.O. Box 475, Valley City, ND 58072, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. BordenNo. 20160187

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Antonio Borden appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition, aggravated assault, and menacing. On appeal, Borden argues the guilty verdicts are not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Douglas L. Mattson, D.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Douglas L. Mattson, D.J., sitting in place of Tufte, J., disqualified.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.