Nesheim v. Nesheim
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: District court order denying post-judgment motion to amend findings of fact summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 244
Christine M. Nesheim, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Eric Nesheim, Defendant
No. 20160159
Appeal from the District Court of Traill County, East
Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas R. Olson,
Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Christine M. Nesheim, 718 5th Avenue
Southeast, Mayville, N.D. 58257, plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
Eric Nesheim,
defendant; no appearance.
Nesheim v. NesheimNo. 20160159Per Curiam.[¶1]
Christine Nesheim appeals from a district court order denying her post-judgment motion to
amend findings of fact. On appeal she argues, among other things, that the district court erred in
its division of the parties' property, debts and mineral interests; the court erred in failing to award
temporary spousal and child support back to February 2015; the court erred in dividing Eric
Nesheim's business property and debts; and the court incorrectly named the pension fund for
purposes of a qualified domestic relations order. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle,
C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V.
Sandstrom
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.