Interest of Thill

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 89

In the Interest of Maurice Robert Thill Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
Maurice Robert Thill, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20160047

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.

Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, 210 Second Ave. NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for petitioner and appellee. Kent M. Morrow, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of ThillNo. 20160047

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Maurice Robert Thill appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Thill argues the district court's order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.