Beeter v. State
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: A district court's order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 119
Robert Duane Beeter, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20160041
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, 103 South Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Marie A. Miller, Ward County Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Beeter v. StateNo. 20160041
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Robert Beeter appeals a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Beeter argues the district court erred in denying his application because his trial counsel's representation was ineffective. Specifically, he alleges his trial counsel did not provide him with discovery, did not pursue pretrial investigation, and did not adequately advise him so that he could make an informed and intelligent decision before entering a plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.