Interest of G.L.D.
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: A district court order denying petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 25
In the Interest of G.L.D.
Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
G.L.D., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20150226
Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Brian D. Grosinger, Assistant State's Attorney, 210 Second Avenue N.W, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Gregory I. Runge, 1983 East Capitol Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of G.L.D.No. 20150226
Per Curiam.
[¶1] G.L.D. appeals from a district court order entered on remand denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. G.L.D. argues the district court erred in finding there was clear and convincing evidence that he is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct which would constitute a danger to the physical or mental health of others and that he has serious difficulty in controlling his behavior. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.