State v. Odermann

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A criminal judgment for burglary and theft of property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 51

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Michael Kendrick Odermann, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20150216

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jerod E. Tufte, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Frederick R. Fremgen (on brief), State's Attorney, 511 Second Avenue S.E., Jamestown, ND 58401, for plaintiff and appellee.
Mark T. Blumer (on brief), P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for defendant and appellant.

State v. OdermannNo. 20150216

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Michael Odermann appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary and two counts of theft of property. He argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the convictions. We conclude there was substantial evidence to support the verdicts and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.