State v. Russell

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Amended criminal judgment revoking defendant's probation and sentencing him to prison is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 7

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Charles William Russell, II, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20150205

Appeal from the District Court of Dunn County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pat J. Merriman, Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 747, Killdeer, N.D. 58640-0747, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Charles W. Russell, II, self-represented, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506, defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. RussellNo. 20150205

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Charles William Russell, II, appeals from an amended criminal judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to two years in prison. Russell argues the district court erred in revoking his probation and sentencing him without first determining that he was mentally competent to represent himself or to understand the proceedings. Russell also argues the court lacked jurisdiction in this case because he claims his "body to be in the Divine Trust." We conclude the court did not commit obvious error by failing to hold a competency hearing on its own motion and the court had jurisdiction over the proceedings. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.