State v. Feist
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal judgment for criminal mischief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 164
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Douglas Gary Feist, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20150041
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, The Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Britta Demello Rice, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.
Michael R. Hoffman, P.O. Box 1056, Bismarck, ND 58502-1056, for defendant and appellant.
State v. FeistNo. 20150041
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Douglas Gary Feist appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury conviction of criminal mischief and from a district court order granting the State's motion in limine to limit evidence of restitution. Feist argues the district court erred by granting the State's motion in limine. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.