Interest of Hoff
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: A district court's findings of fact and order denying discharge and order for continued commitment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 82
In the Interest of Robert R. Hoff
Pamela A. Nesvig, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
Robert R. Hoff, Respondent and Appellant
No. 20140424
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pamela Ann Nesvig, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, ND 58506-5518, for petitioner and appellee; on brief.
Gregory Ian Runge, 1983 East Capitol Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellant; on brief.
Interest of HoffNo. 20140424
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Robert R. Hoff appeals from a district court's findings of fact and order denying discharge and order for continued commitment. Hoff argues the district court erred in concluding clear and convincing evidence exists that Hoff is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct, that he constitutes a danger to the physical or mental health of others because of the alleged personality disorder and that Hoff has serious difficulty in controlling his behavior. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.