Weston v. Crummy
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: A primary residential responsibility determination is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 168
Amanda J. Weston, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Thomas L. Crummy, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20140421
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Gregory W. Liebl (argued) and Luke T. Heck (on brief), 4627 44th Avenue S., Suite 108, Fargo, ND 58104, for plaintiff and appellant.
Joshua Nyberg, 1018 First Avenue N., Fargo, ND 58102-4602, for defendant and appellee.
Weston v. CrummyNo. 20140421
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Amanda Weston appeals from a district court judgment awarding Thomas Crummy primary residential responsibility of their minor child. Weston argues the district court erred in granting Crummy primary residential responsibility because the court ignored credible evidence favorable to Weston and disregarded evidence unfavorable to Crummy. We conclude the district court's findings on the best interest factors and its determination to award Crummy primary residential responsibility of the child were not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.