Interest of D.V.A.

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Orders denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 84

Interest of D.V.A. Julie Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20140384

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County Assistant State's Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, petitioner and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 North 4th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of D.V.A.No. 20140384

Per Curiam.

[¶1] D.V.A. appealed from a district court order and amended order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence he is likely to engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct and has serious difficulty controlling his behavior. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.