Rudolph v. N.D. Department of Transportation

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision revoking driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 65

Kirby Clarence Rudolph, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
North Dakota Department of Transportation, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20110334

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Danny Lee Herbel (argued), The Regency Business Center, 3333 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellant.
Michael Trent Pitcher (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 North 9th Street, Bismarck, ND 58501-4509, for defendant and appellee.

Rudolph v. N.D. Department of TransportationNo. 20110334

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Kirby Clarence Rudolph appeals a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision revoking his driving privileges for three years. Rudolph argues law enforcement did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude the agency's order is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.