State v. VanDyke

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Criminal judgment for gross sexual imposition is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 190

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Ned D. VanDyke, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20110325

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Reid A. Brady (on brief) and Ryan J. Younggren (on brief), Assistant State's Attorneys, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.
Monty G. Mertz (on brief) and Christopher S. Joseph (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Fargo Public Defender Office, 912 Third Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103-1707, for defendant and appellant.

State v. VanDykeNo. 20110325

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ned VanDyke appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty on three counts of gross sexual imposition. On appeal, VanDyke argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdicts. We conclude sufficient evidence exists to support the verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.