State v. Carpenter

Annotate this Case

Court Description: A district court amended criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 46

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Joseph Anthony Carpenter, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20110283

Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd Ronald Erickson (submitted on brief), State's Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, ND 58577-1108, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow (submitted on brief), 411 N. 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.

State v. CarpenterNo. 20110283

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Joseph Anthony Carpenter appeals a district court amended criminal judgment entered after this Court remanded his case for resentencing. Carpenter argues the district court abused its discretion by sentencing him as a habitual offender. The district court did not abuse its discretion, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.