Interest of B.K. and D.K.

Annotate this Case

Filed July 9, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2009 ND 121

In the Interest of B.K. and D.K., ChildrenKevin Miller, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
B.K., Child; D.K., Child; J.K., Mother; L.K., Father; Sherrice Roness, Guardian Ad Litem; and Executive Director of the N.D. Department of Human Services, Respondents

J.K., Mother, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20090027

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jeffrey Ryan Ubben, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Tatum O'Brien Lindbo, Box 2105, Fargo, N.D. 58107-2105 and Carlye Shea Gast, 655 1st Avenue North, Suite 150, Fargo, N.D. 58102, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Interest of B.K. and D.K.No. 20090027

Per Curiam.

[¶1] The mother of a six-year-old boy and a five-year-old girl appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to the children. She argues the judicial referee and the district court erred in determining the children are deprived and in terminating her parental rights. She also argues the judicial referee erred in denying her motion for written closing arguments at the end of the evidentiary hearing. Because the findings supporting the decision to terminate parental rights are not clearly erroneous and the judicial referee did not abuse her discretion in denying the motion, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.