State v. Jager

Annotate this Case
Filed Oct. 16, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2007 ND 152

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Andrew Thomas Jager, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20070080

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mikal Simonson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jay Anthony Schmitz (on brief), 511 2nd Avenue Southeast, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for plaintiff and appellee.
Scott R. Sandness (on brief), P.O. Box 915, Jamestown, ND 58402-0915, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Jager
No. 20070080

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Andrew Thomas Jager appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possessing drug paraphernalia. Jager argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion in limine to prohibit on relevancy grounds the admission of certain prosecution testimony at trial. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion, and we summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.