Interest of K.G.
Annotate this CaseFiled June 29, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2006 ND 130
In the Interest of K.G.
William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
K.G., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20060158
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John E. Greenwood, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Thomas E. Merrick, P.O. Box 1900, Jamestown, N.D. 58402-1900, for respondent and appellant; submitted on briefs.
Leo Albert Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 1727, Jamestown, N.D. 58402-1727, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on briefs.
Interest of K.G.No. 20060158
Per Curiam.
[¶1] K.G. appeals from a mental health continuing treatment order arguing that hospitalization is not the least restrictive form of treatment. The trial court's order is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.