City of Bismarck v. Perusquia

Annotate this Case

Filed Oct. 17, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2006 ND 207

City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Martin G. Perusquia, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20060048

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Wayne D. Goter, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1552, for defendant and appellant; submitted on briefs.
Paul H. Fraase, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5503, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on briefs.

City of Bismarck v. Perusquia
No. 20060048

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Martin Perusquia appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. He argues the City of Bismarck did not present sufficient evidence to convict him. The record contains sufficient evidence to support the conviction; therefore, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.