Krall v. State
Annotate this Case[Go to Documents]Filed Mar. 29, 2006[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2006 ND 51
Dawn M. Krall, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Nos. 20050211-20050213
Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable David W. Nelson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Dawn M. Krall (on brief), pro se, 5110 Highway 2E, #85, Minot, ND 58701, petitioner and appellant.
Mark A. Flagstad (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 315 3rd St. SE, Minot, ND 58701-3998, for respondent and appellee.
Krall v. State
Nos. 20050211-20050213
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Dawn Krall appeals from an order denying her applications for post-conviction relief and her motions for default judgment. The district court determined Krall was not entitled to a default judgment and failed to prove her claims for post-conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). Bell v. State, 1998 ND 35, 575 N.W.2d 211.
[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.