State v. White Mountain

Annotate this Case

Filed Dec. 20, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2005 ND 209

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Mikal White Mountain, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20050157

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Susan Schmidt, 411 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.
Lloyd Clayton Suhr, Assistant State's Attorney, and Jeffrey R. Ubben (argued), Third-Year Law Student, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.

State v. White Mountain
No. 20050157

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Mikal John White Mountain was convicted by a jury of gross sexual imposition and tampering with evidence. He appeals from the criminal judgment, arguing the evidence was insufficient to convict him and the victim was not adequately identified in the criminal information.

[¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7), concluding there was sufficient evidence to uphold the verdict and his objection to the information cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.