State v. Jackson

Filed July 13, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2005 ND 121

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Grady Jackson, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20050020 & 20050021

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Grady Jackson, pro se, Bismarck, N.D. 58504, defendant and appellant.

State v. Jackson
Nos. 20050020 & 20050021

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Grady Jackson appeals from two district court orders denying suppression of evidence and from the criminal judgments of conviction of driving under suspension entered on N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) conditional guilty pleas, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motions for suppression of evidence.

[¶2] Jackson did not provide a copy of the district court transcript for appeal. As the appellant in this case, it was his duty to order a transcript of the proceedings to allow this Court to have meaningful review of the facts. N.D.R.App.P. 10(b); State v. Clark, 2001 ND 194, ¶ 5, 636 N.W.2d 660. Without a transcript, this Court is unable to assess Jackson's contention that the police officers did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop him. See State v. Runck, 418 N.W.2d 262, 267 (N.D. 1987).

[¶3] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3), and (7).

[¶4]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring