State v. Mooney

Annotate this Case

[Go to Documents]Filed Jan. 19, 2005[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2005 ND 6

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
William Mooney, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20040180-182

Appeal from the District Court of Walsh County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable M. Richard Geiger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Sarah Elizabeth Cannon (argued), Assistant State's Attorney, 600 Cooper Avenue, Grafton, N.D. 57237, for plaintiff and appellee.
DeWayne Johnston (appeared), and Sandra Hagen (argued), third-year law student, Olson Johnston Law Office, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 100A, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Mooney
Nos. 20040180-182

Per Curiam.

[¶1] William Mooney appealed from three criminal judgments, contending the trial court erred in allowing testimony about a statement he made. The judgments are affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.