Weathers v. Peters

Annotate this Case

Weathers v. Peters, 2001 ND 23, 625 N.W.2d 264

[Go to Documents]Filed Feb. 15, 2001[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2001 ND 23

Jon Weathers and Vickie Weathers, Individually and as Husband and Wife, and as Natural Parents and Guardians of Nathan Weathers, a minor, Kelly Weathers, and Andrea Schmidt, Plaintiffs and Appellants
v.
Leonard J. Peters and Linda L. Peters, Husband and Wife, d/b/a Peters Enterprises; and Larry D. Crabbe, Defendants and Appellees

No. 20000141

Appeal from the District Court of Pierce County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Lee A. Christofferson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
MaryAnn Leavitt (argued) and Jeff Rotering (on brief), Rotering Law Office, 215 S. Main, P.O. Box 1379, Hettinger, ND 58639-1379, for plaintiffs and appellants.
Richard H. McGee II, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, Norwest Bank Building, P.O. Box 998, Minot, ND 58702-0998, for defendants and appellees.

Weathers v. Peters
No. 20000141

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Jon and Vickie Weathers appeal from the trial court's denial of a Motion to Exclude Evidence of the results of a Blood Alcohol Concentration ("BAC") test and from the Judgment on Jury Verdict dismissing their claims on the merits and with prejudice. The Weathers challenge admission of the BAC test results into evidence, arguing the test was not fairly administered when alcohol swabs were used to sterilize the same arm nearly two hours prior to drawing blood for the BAC test. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the BAC test results into evidence, after a proper foundation was established by certification of scrupulous compliance with test procedures and by expert testimony. Because the Weathers failed to introduce adequate evidence to rebut the foundation of fair administration of the BAC test, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.