Huber v. Dooher

Annotate this Case

Huber v. Dooher, 1997 ND 87, 569 N.W.2d 288

[Go to Documents]Filed May 13, 1997IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA1997 ND 87Darren Huber,Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Genae Dooher, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Anthony Dooher, Deceased,Defendant and Appellant

Civil No. 970011

Appeal from the District Court for Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence A. Leclerc, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Robert G. Hoy and Steven E. McCullough of Ohnstad Twichell, P.C., 901 13th Avenue East, P.O. Box 458, West Fargo, N.D. 58078-0458, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by Robert G. Hoy.
Ronald J. Knoll of Jeffries, Olson, Flom & Bullis, P.A., P.O. Box 9, Moorhead, Minnesota 56561-0009, for defendant and appellant.

Huber v. Dooher
Civil No. 970011

Per Curiam.

[¶1] In this negligence case, the defendant urges we accept the sudden, unforeseeable loss of physical capacity or consciousness as a defense to negligence claims arising out of automobile accidents, and urges we conclude the trial court clearly erred in not finding the occurrence of such an event. Because the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, we do not reach the question of law. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Herbert L. Meschke
Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.