State v. Hough

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 141PA10 FILED 27 JUNE 2013 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. KERRY McKINLEY HOUGH On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. ' 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 202 N.C. App. 674, 690 S.E.2d 285 (2010), finding no error in judgments entered on 10 December 2008 by Judge Calvin E. Murphy in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 February 2013. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Daniel P. O Brien, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel D. Addison, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State. Robert W. Ewing for defendant-appellant. PER CURIAM. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, STATE V. HOUGH Opinion of the Court 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010). AFFIRMED. -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.