Daniel v. Carolina Sunrock Corp.

Annotate this Case

436 S.E.2d 835 (1993)

335 N.C. 233

Joyce M. DANIEL, v. CAROLINA SUNROCK CORPORATION, a North Carolina Corporation, and Bryan Pfohl, Individually.

No. 261A93.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 3, 1993.

*836 Pulley, Watson & King, P.A. by Tracy Kenyon Lischer, Durham, for plaintiff-appellee.

Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson and Greaves, P.A. by Charles P. Roberts, III, and Lucretia D. Smith, Greensboro, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Lewis, 110 N.C.App. at 384, 430 S.E.2d at 311, the decision of the Court of Appeals on the issue of wrongful discharge, the only issue before this Court, is reversed.

REVERSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.