State v. McCleary
Annotate this Case316 S.E.2d 870 (1984)
STATE of North Carolina v. William Frank McCLEARY.
No. 13A84.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
July 6, 1984.
Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Steven F. Bryant, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.
Gingles & Hamrick by Ralph C. Gingles, Jr., Dastonia, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
We have considered the briefs of the parties, they having by stipulation waived oral argument, on the question of the constitutionality of our statutes controlling lotteries, N.C.Gen.Stat. ยงยง 14-289, 14-290, and 14-292.1. We have also considered the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals and the thoughtful, well-reasoned, and thoroughly documented majority opinion of that court justifying its decision sustaining the constitutionality of the questioned statutes. We conclude that the decision should be and it is
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
