State v. Watlington

Annotate this Case

228 S.E.2d 457 (1976)

290 N.C. 666

STATE of North Carolina v. Joyce Marie WATLINGTON.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 1, 1976.

A. Carl Penney, for defendant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Norma S. Harrell, Associate Atty., for the State.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, N.C.App., 226 S.E.2d 186. Denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of a substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.