Joyner v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM

Annotate this Case

147 S.E.2d 602 (1966)

267 N.C. 44

Charles W. JOYNER, Petitioner, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Amos Speas, J. A. Hancock, Carl Dull, Jr., Roy Setzer, A. T. Harrington, C. C. Smithdeal and Douglas B. Elam, Respondents.

No. 458.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 1966.

Harold R. Wilson, Edward R. Green, Winston-Salem, for petitioner appellant.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, by W. F. Womble, Winston-Salem, for respondent appellees.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the same legal questions decided this day in the companion case of Craver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 147 S.E.2d 599. The two cases were argued together by the same counsel. On the authority of that decision, the judgment is

Affirmed.

MOORE, J., not sitting.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.