Wilson v. Webster
Annotate this Case100 S.E.2d 829 (1957)
247 N.C. 393
William Ira WILSON v. J. L. WEBSTER and wife, Bessie Webster.
No. 666.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
December 11, 1957.
*830 D. Emerson Scarborough, Yanceyville, for defendants-appellants.
No counsel contra.
PER CURIAM.
The only assignment of error on this appeal is to the failure of the court below to sustain the defendants' motion for judgment as of nonsuit.
It would seem that under the provisions of G.S. ยง 20-141(e) and our decisions, the evidence adduced in the trial below was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Burchette v. Davis Distributing Co., 243 N.C. 120, 90 S.E.2d 232; Chaffin v. Brame, 233 N.C. 377, 64 S.E.2d 276; Boles v. Hegler, 232 N.C. 327, 59 S.E.2d 796; Cummins v. Fruit Co., 225 N.C. 625, 36 S.E.2d 11.
The ruling of the court below is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
