Wood v. Massingill
Annotate this Case91 S.E.2d 588 (1956)
243 N.C. 625
W. L. WOOD v. Lecy MASSINGILL and Thelma Davis.
No. 22.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
February 29, 1956.
*589 Thomas R. Eller, Jr., Brevard, for plaintiff.
Potts & Ramsey, Brevard, Monroe M. Redden, Hendersonville, for defendants.
PER CURIAM.
The sole question presented for us to determine is whether or not the evidence adduced in the trial below is sufficient to support the verdict. We have concluded that it is sufficient to do so. Bowen v. Darden, 241 N.C. 11, 84 S.E.2d 289. Moreover, all the evidence points unerringly to the fact that the verdict is in accord with equity and justice. The result will be upheld.
No error.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
