Warren v. Winfrey

Annotate this Case

94 S.E.2d 481 (1956)

244 N.C. 521

William A. WARREN v. A. P. WINFREY, Jr., and Clement C. Bell, Trading as Clinton Motor Company.

No. 171.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 26, 1956.

David J. Turlington, Jr., Clinton, for plaintiff, appellant.

Butler & Butler, Clinton, for defendants, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

"The power of the court to grant an involuntary nonsuit is altogether statutory and must be exercised in accord with the statute. G.S. § 1-183." Ward v. Cruse, 234 N.C. 388, 67 S.E.2d 257, 258.

G.S. § 1-183 provides that "When on trial of an issue of fact in a civil action *482 * * *, the plaintiff has introduced his evidence and rested his case, the defendant may move * * * for judgment as in case of nonsuit."

The court had no power to nonsuit the case before plaintiff rested his case. For this error plaintiff is entitled to a new trial. In the state of the record the questions discussed in the briefs are not presented for decision.

Reversed.

JOHNSON, J., not sitting.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.