Hardin v Don Love, Inc
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. NO. COA01-379 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 5 February 2002 STEVE GARY HARDIN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Industrial Commission I.C. No. 553290 DON LOVE, INC. Defendant/Appellee, and ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier, Defendant/Appellee Appeal by plaintiff from opinion and award entered 31 October 2000 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard in the Court of Appeals 14 January 2002. Coward, Hicks & Siler, plaintiff-appellant. P.A., by Orville D. Coward, for Russell & King, P.A., by Sandra M. King, for defendantappellees. BRYANT, Judge. Plaintiff purports to appeal from an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission denying plaintiff s claim for additional compensation. The notice of appeal to this Court is not included in the record on appeal before us. We are required by Bailey v. State, 353 N.C. 142, 156, 540 S.E.2d 313, 322 (2000), to dismiss an appeal when the record on appeal does not contain the notice of -2appeal giving this Court jurisdiction. dismissed. Dismissed. Judges WYNN and THOMAS concur. Report per Rule 30(e). The appeal is therefore
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
